Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
09/06/2026 11:48 pm
TL;DR: IT asset management software is increasingly framed as a way to create a single source of truth for hardware and software inventory, lifecycle tracking, and audit readiness, according to Zluri. For identity teams, the deeper issue is that asset visibility does not automatically equal identity governance, especially where SaaS, devices, and non-human access overlap.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: IT Teams Top 20 IT Asset Management Software - 2026
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should teams connect IT asset management with identity governance?
A: Teams should connect asset records to ownership, entitlement, and approval data so they can see who can actually act through each asset.
Q: Why do IT asset inventories create governance gaps for non-human identities?
A: Because many non-human identities outlive the asset record that introduced them.
Q: What breaks when asset retirement does not include access removal?
A: The organisation ends up with orphaned access, stale integrations, and lingering administrative authority after the asset is gone.
Practitioner guidance
- Map assets to live entitlements Join discovery data to identity and access records so every critical asset has a current owner, attached credential, and approval state.
- Tie disposal to deprovisioning Make asset retirement trigger revocation of admin rights, service accounts, API keys, and vendor access before the asset record is closed.
- Include access lineage in audit packs Require reports to show who had access, when it changed, and which workflow approved it, rather than only listing the asset itself.
What's in the full article
Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Per-tool feature breakdowns for the 20 IT asset management platforms listed in the article.
- Vendor-specific notes on discovery, inventory tracking, software licensing, and audit preparation capabilities.
- Implementation-oriented differences in lifecycle coverage, reporting, and asset visibility across the tools.
- Product-by-product descriptions that help teams compare ITAM feature sets before shortlisting.
👉 Read Zluri's roundup of top IT asset management software for 2026 →
IT asset management software: what IAM teams are missing?
Explore further
10/06/2026 2:17 am
Asset visibility is not identity governance. ITAM tools can show what exists, but they do not automatically tell you who can act through it, by what credential, or under what approval state. That matters because many modern assets are bound to service accounts, OAuth connections, tokens, and automation paths that sit outside classic inventory logic. The practical conclusion is that inventory without entitlement context gives a false sense of control.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, 46% confirmed and 26% suspected, according to The 2024 ESG Report: Managing Non-Human Identities.
- Two-thirds of enterprises have endured a successful cyberattack resulting from compromised non-human identities, with a quarter encountering multiple attacks.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do organisations prove audit readiness for assets and access at the same time?
A: They need reports that show asset ownership, entitlement history, change approvals, and revocation evidence together. A clean asset list is not enough if it cannot show who had access and whether that access was still justified. Audit readiness depends on traceable identity lineage, not inventory volume.
👉 Read our full editorial: IT asset management software and the identity surface gap
