Topic starter
09/06/2026 11:48 pm
TL;DR: IT asset management software is increasingly framed as a way to create a single source of truth for hardware and software inventory, lifecycle tracking, and audit readiness, according to Zluri. For identity teams, the deeper issue is that asset visibility does not automatically equal identity governance, especially where SaaS, devices, and non-human access overlap.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Zluri: “Top 20 IT Asset Management Software - 2026”.
Key questions
Q: How should IAM teams use IT asset management data without confusing it with governance?
A: Treat ITAM as a source of facts, not a governance decision layer.
Q: Why do asset inventories miss stale access and orphaned entitlements?
A: Because assets and identities are related but not identical.
Q: When should organisations prioritise identity governance over IT asset visibility?
A: When the risk is access misuse rather than missing inventory.
Practitioner guidance
- Align ITAM feeds to identity governance Connect asset inventory, ownership, and lifecycle events to IGA workflows so deprovisioning, recertification, and exception handling use current asset context.
- Map SaaS assets to access ownership Require every managed SaaS application to have a business owner, technical owner, and explicit entitlement review path before it is treated as governed.
- Treat device records as identity context Use device inventory to inform authentication and access decisions, especially where endpoints anchor SSO sessions, admin access, or conditional access policy.
Bottom line: IT asset management software improves discovery, tracking, and reporting, but it does not by itself resolve identity governance gaps.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
10/06/2026 2:17 am
Asset visibility is not identity governance. ITAM tools can show what exists, but they do not automatically tell you who can act through it, by what credential, or under what approval state. That matters because many modern assets are bound to service accounts, OAuth connections, tokens, and automation paths that sit outside classic inventory logic. The practical conclusion is that inventory without entitlement context gives a false sense of control.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, 46% confirmed and 26% suspected, according to The 2024 ESG Report: Managing Non-Human Identities.
- Two-thirds of enterprises have endured a successful cyberattack resulting from compromised non-human identities, with a quarter encountering multiple attacks.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do organisations prove audit readiness for assets and access at the same time?
A: They need reports that show asset ownership, entitlement history, change approvals, and revocation evidence together. A clean asset list is not enough if it cannot show who had access and whether that access was still justified. Audit readiness depends on traceable identity lineage, not inventory volume.
👉 Read our full editorial: IT asset management software and the identity surface gap
10/06/2026 9:26 pm
ITAM creates visibility, not authority: asset inventories are useful only when they feed a governance layer that can decide access, ownership, and lifecycle outcomes. A repository can centralise facts about hardware and software, but it cannot certify whether the identities attached to those assets are still valid. Practitioners should treat ITAM as a dependency of identity governance, not a replacement for it.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Nearly 60% of IT leaders cite restrictive cost and complexity as a weakness of legacy identity governance, according to the 2025 State of Identity Governance Report.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What is the difference between asset inventory and identity governance?
A: Asset inventory tells you what exists, while identity governance tells you who can use it, why they can use it, and when that access should end. Inventory is a visibility problem. Governance is an entitlement and accountability problem, which is why the two functions need to be linked rather than managed separately.
👉 Read our full editorial: IT asset management software and the identity surface gap
This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group