Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
23/06/2026 7:06 pm
TL;DR: Managed DNS can improve website performance, resilience, and DNS integrity by using load balancing, secondary DNS, failover, and DNSSEC, according to DigiCert. For identity and security teams, the takeaway is that availability controls and trust controls need to be governed together, because DNS outages and hijacking both change access outcomes.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by DigiCert: Managed DNS for Denver, CO: With 100% Uptime
By the numbers:
- Research indicates that a one-second delay in website loading time can lead to a 7% reduction in conversions.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams govern DNS when it supports identity and access flows?
A: Treat DNS as a dependency of identity assurance, not just a networking service.
Q: Why does DNSSEC matter for IAM and workload identity programmes?
A: DNSSEC matters because a valid lookup is not enough if the response can be altered.
Q: What breaks when managed DNS is treated as a pure uptime tool?
A: Teams miss the trust and identity impact of DNS compromise.
Practitioner guidance
- Map DNS as an identity dependency Document which authentication, certificate, and workload identity flows depend on DNS resolution, then assign ownership for that dependency in IAM or security architecture reviews.
- Test DNS failover independently Run failover tests for primary and secondary DNS separately from application recovery testing so you can prove name resolution survives provider or path disruption.
- Enable DNSSEC where integrity matters Prioritise DNSSEC on zones that support login, service discovery, or certificate validation, then verify signing, chain of trust, and resolver support end to end.
What's in the full article
DigiCert's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- How DigiCert DNS Trust Manager positions DNSSEC, secondary DNS, and failover in its managed DNS stack.
- The practical performance claims and customer-facing positioning behind the Denver managed DNS example.
- The implementation framing for organisations that want to reduce load time, preserve availability, and protect DNS integrity.
- The service-specific messaging around business continuity for teams evaluating managed DNS options.
👉 Read DigiCert's managed DNS guidance for performance, security, and uptime →
Managed DNS and DNSSEC: what it means for uptime and trust?
Explore further
25/06/2026 2:56 am
Managed DNS is now an identity-adjacent control plane, not a perimeter utility. DNS decides whether identities can reach the services they are meant to access, which makes it part of the access path rather than a background networking detail. When teams separate DNS from IAM, they miss a layer where spoofing, outage, and routing failure can change the effective access outcome. Practitioners should treat DNS governance as part of identity resilience planning.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 1.5 out of 10 organisations are highly confident in their ability to secure NHIs, compared to nearly 1 in 4 for securing human identities, according to The State of Non-Human Identity Security.
- Lack of credential rotation is cited as the top cause of NHI-related attacks by 45% of organisations, followed by inadequate monitoring and logging at 37% and over-privileged accounts at 37%.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What is the difference between DNS failover and DNS integrity controls?
A: Failover keeps resolution available when a primary DNS path fails. Integrity controls such as DNSSEC help prove the response has not been altered. You need both, because a service that stays online but points users to the wrong destination still creates security and operational risk.
👉 Read our full editorial: Managed DNS and DNSSEC reduce outage and hijack risk
