Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 10:49 pm
TL;DR: Manufacturing access delays can quietly translate into hours of lost output each week, with IBM cited in the article as putting average breach identification and containment time in industrial sectors at 199 days. The operational message is that IAM in plants is no longer only an access control problem, it is an uptime and throughput issue.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Imprivata: manufacturing IAM access friction and productivity
By the numbers:
- In a 24-hour facility with rotating shifts, reducing authentication time at each workstation by even one minute per user can translate into several reclaimed hours of operational time each week.
- According to IBM, the average time to identify and contain a breach across industrial sectors is 199 days.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should manufacturers reduce access friction without weakening security?
A: Manufacturers should remove repeated authentication steps with SSO, use MFA that fits the work environment, and standardise access across devices and locations.
Q: Why do login delays matter so much in plant environments?
A: Login delays matter because manufacturing productivity depends on repetition at scale.
Q: How can security teams tell whether IAM is helping or hurting operations?
A: They should look at access latency, password-reset volume, onboarding delay, and the number of exceptions caused by device or location changes.
Practitioner guidance
- Measure login latency as a production metric Track average authentication time by workstation, shift, and facility so access friction is visible in the same dashboards used for throughput and downtime.
- Standardise SSO across production applications Remove redundant sign-ins between core systems so workers can move across tasks without repeated authentication.
- Use low-friction MFA at the point of work Choose MFA methods that fit plant conditions such as badge-based or biometric authentication where appropriate, so assurance does not interrupt workflow at shared devices and shift handoffs.
What's in the full article
Imprivata's full analysis covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Workstation-by-workstation examples showing how login time accumulates into lost production hours
- The article's own manufacturing scenarios for shift changes, onboarding, and repeated authentication
- Specific ways access delays drive helpdesk demand and pull IT away from operational support
- The vendor's framing of IAM as an enabler of floor productivity rather than only a security control
👉 Read Imprivata's analysis of IAM access friction in manufacturing →
Manufacturing IAM access friction: what it means for uptime and floor access?
Explore further
25/06/2026 11:30 pm
Access friction is an operational control failure, not a minor user-experience issue. Manufacturing environments expose the cost of authentication overhead more clearly than office environments because access delays translate directly into output loss. The industry often treats IAM as a back-office control layer, but in plants it is part of production continuity. Practitioners should evaluate IAM by its effect on uptime, not only on policy compliance.
A few things that frame the scale:
- The average estimated time to remediate a leaked secret is 27 days, despite 75% of organisations expressing strong confidence in their secrets management capabilities, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
- Organisations maintain an average of 6 distinct secrets manager instances, creating fragmentation that undermines centralised control, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own productivity-first IAM decisions in manufacturing?
A: Accountability should sit jointly with security, IAM, and operations leadership because the impact shows up in both risk and throughput. If access problems reduce output or increase support burden, the issue is operational. Identity controls in manufacturing should be governed as part of production resilience, not treated as a purely technical back-office concern.
👉 Read our full editorial: Manufacturing IAM access friction is quietly draining production output
