Mobile application management: what IAM teams should actually govern

TL;DR: Mobile application management software is presented as a way to secure apps on personal and corporate devices, but the article’s real value is in showing how access control, compliance enforcement, and lifecycle management shape the mobile app surface, according to Zluri. The governance lesson is broader: unmanaged app access is an identity problem, not just an endpoint problem.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Miscellaneous Top 9 Mobile Application Management Software in 2026

By the numbers:

• 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, 46% confirmed and 26% suspected.
• Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security.
• Systems with least-privileged AI access had a 17% incident rate vs 76% for over-privileged systems.

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should IAM teams govern mobile application access in BYOD environments?

A: IAM teams should govern mobile app access as an entitlement problem, not just a device problem.

Q: Why do mobile apps create identity governance gaps?

A: Mobile apps create governance gaps when access is approved once and then left outside lifecycle processes.

Q: What do organisations get wrong about mobile application management?

A: Organisations often treat mobile application management as a device administration function.

Practitioner guidance

• Map mobile app approvals to identity policy Require each approved business app to have a named access owner, a usage condition, and a revocation trigger.
• Extend access reviews into the mobile app layer Add mobile app entitlements to quarterly access certification, including apps on personal devices and apps with data-sharing permissions.
• Separate app-layer controls from full-device control Use app-level restrictions for copy, paste, sync, and remote wipe where BYOD is in scope, so security teams can protect corporate data without claiming full ownership of the device.

What's in the full article

Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Feature-by-feature comparison of the listed mobile application management tools and how they differ in deployment depth.
• Product-specific pros, cons, and user ratings for each platform, which are useful when narrowing an implementation shortlist.
• The article's full breakdown of app distribution, reporting, and device-management features across the nine tools.
• Vendor positioning details for teams that need to compare options before selecting a mobile app management stack.

👉 Read Zluri's roundup of top mobile application management software →

Mobile application management: what IAM teams should actually govern?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →