Topic starter
03/06/2026 7:25 pm
TL;DR: Non-human identities are on track to outnumber human identities by 100 to 1 in enterprise environments, and Entro Security argues that lifecycle management, AI-assisted detection, and zero-trust controls will become central to 2025 security planning. The governance assumption that machine access can be handled like human access is already breaking down.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Entro Security: “Cybersecurity Predictions for 2025: A Non-Human Identity Takeover”.
By the numbers:
- NHIs are on track to outnumber human identities by 100 to 1 in enterprise environments.
Key questions
Q: How should teams govern non-human identities in AI-heavy environments?
A: Teams should govern non-human identities the same way they govern other privileged assets: assign ownership, minimise scope, rotate credentials regularly, and monitor for abnormal use.
Q: What problem does ownership attribution solve for service accounts and API keys?
A: It closes the gap between exposure detection and accountable remediation.
Q: What are the signs that NHI governance is failing in an enterprise?
A: Common warning signs include unclear ownership for service accounts, secrets stored in code or configuration instead of managed vaults, infrequent rotation, and weak offboarding of API keys.
Practitioner guidance
- Map your full NHI estate Build a continuous inventory of API keys, service accounts, cloud tokens and other machine identities from the systems where they are created and used.
- Tie ownership to issuance and offboarding Assign an accountable owner for every NHI and make revocation part of the same lifecycle process that creates the credential.
- Reduce standing trust in machine access Scope permissions tightly, rotate secrets regularly and remove credentials that no longer have an active business purpose.
Bottom line: Non-human identities are moving from background infrastructure to a primary IAM governance problem as their volume overtakes human accounts.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
03/06/2026 7:28 pm
NHI lifecycle management is becoming the control plane for enterprise IAM. The article is right to put discovery, inventory, creation-time governance and offboarding ahead of point-in-time protection. When NHIs are multiplying faster than the organisation can classify them, lifecycle discipline becomes the only durable way to know what exists and who owns it. Practitioners should treat NHI lifecycle management as a core IAM programme, not a side task.
A few things that frame the scale:
- NHIs outnumber human identities by 25x to 50x in modern enterprises, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should security teams govern machine identities in zero trust environments?
A: Security teams should govern machine identities with the same discipline used for privileged human access: inventory, ownership, policy-based approval, rotation, monitoring, and revocation. Zero trust only works when every non-human credential has a known purpose and a short, enforceable lifecycle. Without that, machine access becomes a hidden standing privilege layer inside the environment.
👉 Read our full editorial: Non-human identities will dominate 2025 IAM planning