Passwordless identity verification: what it means for IAM teams

TL;DR: Passwordless identity verification, biometrics tied to verified credentials, and strong government certifications are positioned as the response to password and SMS-based MFA failures, according to 1Kosmos. The shift matters because identity assurance now has to replace perimeter-era trust assumptions across human access programmes, not just add another login layer.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by 1Kosmos: passwordless identity verification, biometric assurance, and the shift away from password-centric security

By the numbers:

• The company says its recent $57 million Series B brings total funding to over $72 million.
• The article cites a $194.5 million agreement for Login.gov through Carahsoft.

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should organisations decide where passwordless authentication is worth using?

A: Use passwordless first where phishing risk, remote access, or high-value data make credential theft more dangerous than enrolment friction.

Q: Why do deepfakes and social engineering change human IAM requirements?

A: They change the threat model from secret theft to identity impersonation.

Q: What do organisations get wrong when they replace passwords with biometrics?

A: They often assume the biometric itself is the security control.

Practitioner guidance

• Reassess login assurance by population Separate low-risk employee logins from privileged, contractor, and citizen-style access flows, then define different assurance levels for each.
• Harden identity proofing and recovery Review enrolment, recovery, and account re-binding steps for passwordless access so the process is stronger than the password flow it replaces.
• Map authentication standards to policy Use NIST 800-63-3 and FIDO2 as the basis for access policy decisions, then codify which applications require phishing-resistant methods and which can tolerate lower assurance.

What's in the full article

1Kosmos's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• How the biometric-to-credential binding model works in practice for passwordless authentication
• What the vendor means by deployment times measured in hours instead of months
• How the platform positions NIST 800-63-3, FIDO2, and FedRAMP High in its assurance story
• Which customer and government use cases the vendor says are driving adoption

👉 Read 1Kosmos's analysis of passwordless identity verification and human IAM →

Passwordless identity verification: what it means for IAM teams?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →