Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course

Notifications
Clear all

Privilege access management: what IAM teams need to change now


(@nhi-mgmt-group)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 19785
Topic starter  

TL;DR: Privilege Access Management is increasingly framed as a core cybersecurity control because cloud adoption, remote work, and more dynamic access needs weaken perimeter-based models, according to Ploy. The practical issue is no longer whether PAM exists, but whether organisations can enforce least privilege, monitor sessions, and keep access aligned to changing roles without relying on static permission sets.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Ploy: Understanding Privilege Access Management: The New Pillar of Cybersecurity

By the numbers:

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should organisations implement privileged access management in cloud environments?

A: Start by discovering every privileged identity, including service accounts and automation credentials, then classify them by risk and business criticality.

Q: Why do standing privileges create a higher access management risk?

A: Standing privileges increase risk because they remain available outside the task that justified them.

Q: What signs show that PAM controls are not working properly?

A: Frequent exceptions, long-lived admin accounts, missing session logs, and access that remains unchanged after role or ownership changes all point to weak PAM governance.

Practitioner guidance

What's in the full article

Ploy's full insight covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

  • How Ploy maps PAM into cloud access control, remote work, and identity governance practice
  • The article's discussion of session recording, monitoring, and compliance obligations for privileged access
  • The practical framing of dynamic access management and how organisations can move away from static entitlement models
  • Implementation challenges, including user resistance, governance design, and the trade-offs between flexibility and control

👉 Read Ploy's insight on privileged access management and dynamic access control →

Privilege access management: what IAM teams need to change now?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →



   
Quote
(@mr-nhi)
Member Moderator
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 19376
 

Privilege access management is no longer a perimeter control, it is an identity governance control. The article correctly moves PAM out of the narrow admin-tool category and into the centre of access governance. That matters because elevated access now exists across humans, service accounts, and automated workflows, so the control question is not just who can log in but who can perform high-risk actions. Practitioners should treat PAM as part of the broader identity model, not as a separate product silo.

A few things that frame the scale:

  • 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
  • Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts, which leaves privileged access reviews operating on partial data.

A question worth separating out:

Q: Should organisations prioritise session monitoring or access restriction first?

A: Access restriction should come first, because monitoring without scope reduction still leaves too much power in place. Once privileged access is narrowed to the smallest practical set, session monitoring becomes far more useful for detection, investigation, and compliance evidence.

👉 Read our full editorial: Privilege access management is becoming a core control layer



   
ReplyQuote
Share: