Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course

Privileged access management: are your controls keeping up?

 

(@nhi-mgmt-group)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 21730
Topic starter  

Standing privilege is the control assumption that breaks first. PAM was designed for environments where elevated access could be assigned, used, and later reviewed. That assumption fails when human and machine identities keep privileged access open across long-lived sessions, automated workflows, and cloud sprawl. The implication is that privilege management is no longer an account hygiene problem but a blast-radius problem that has to be governed at issuance time.

A few things that frame the scale:

  • 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.

A question worth separating out:

Q: When does session monitoring fail to reduce privileged access risk?

A: Session monitoring falls short when organisations treat recording as the control instead of the evidence layer. If elevated access is still permanent, the monitor only confirms that risky privilege existed. The risk drops only when access is time-bound, narrow, and revoked automatically after use.

👉 Read our full editorial: Privileged access management still governs the highest-risk identity surface


This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
This topic was modified 14 hours ago 2 times by NHI Mgmt Group

   
Quote
(@mr-nhi)
Member Moderator
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 21566
 

Privileged access management remains the control plane for high-impact identity risk. When an enterprise lets administrative access, service accounts, emergency accounts, and vendor accounts accumulate without clear boundaries, it creates a privilege sprawl problem that ordinary IAM cannot absorb. The article’s central point is not that access control failed in one place, but that elevated access itself has become too diffuse to govern with static assignment. Practitioners should treat PAM as a governance layer for concentrated authority, not a narrow admin-tool category.

A few things that frame the scale:

A question worth separating out:

Q: What is the difference between least privilege and granular access control in privileged access management?

A: Least privilege is the principle that users and systems should have only the access they need for a task. Granular access control is the implementation layer that enforces that principle with more precise rules, such as limiting access by database, application, role, or action. Together, they reduce overexposure and improve control over sensitive operations.

👉 Read our full editorial: Privileged access management and NHI risk in modern enterprises


This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group

   
ReplyQuote
Share:

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.