Topic starter
07/06/2026 9:05 pm
TL;DR: Remote work has grown from about 4% of U.S. jobs before the pandemic to more than 15% today, while 74% of employees say remote work makes them happier and 80% of people leaders describe hybrid setups as emotionally draining, according to StrongDM and cited research. The governance lesson is that location flexibility does not remove identity, access, or boundary-management problems; it just shifts them into more fragmented control planes.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by StrongDM: “11 Surprising Statistics on Remote Work for 2026”.
By the numbers:
- Remote jobs now make up more than 15% of total opportunities in the U.S., up from around 4% before the pandemic.
- 74% of employees feel happier when they work remotely, according to research cited by StrongDM.
- 97% of people recommend remote work to others, according to Buffer research cited by StrongDM.
Key questions
A: Security teams should treat onboarding and offboarding as a continuous governance process, not a one-time HR task.
Q: Why does access governance become harder in hybrid enterprise environments?
A: Because identity and entitlement state becomes fragmented across platforms, owners, and review processes.
Q: What are the signs that remote access controls are not working as intended?
A: Warning signs include vulnerable endpoints, misconfigured remote access systems, users reaching sensitive data they do not need, and audit findings that show policies are not being followed.
Practitioner guidance
- Re-baseline trust boundaries for hybrid work Document where access is approved, where it is used, and which controls change between office and home contexts.
- Align conditional access to work context Tie authentication strength, device posture, and session restrictions to the actual environment a user is operating in, not to a fixed workplace model that no longer reflects reality.
- Review privileged access by operating mode Check whether administrative and high-risk access follows the same approval, monitoring, and revocation path in remote and in-office scenarios.
Bottom line: Remote and hybrid work are now durable operating models, which means identity governance has to assume movement between environments rather than a single fixed workplace.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
08/06/2026 8:53 am
Hybrid work is a governance model, not a workplace preference. The security failure in many organisations is treating hybrid as an HR or productivity decision instead of an identity boundary problem. Once the same person can authenticate from multiple contexts, the programme has to govern trust, session control, and approvals across all of them. The practitioner takeaway is that hybrid work should be designed as a control-plane issue, not a scheduling issue.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What is the difference between hybrid work governance and remote access management?
A: Hybrid work governance is the broader discipline of aligning identity, access, and accountability across multiple work contexts. Remote access management is narrower and usually focuses on connectivity and entry control. A mature programme needs both, because the access path and the governance rules are not the same thing.
👉 Read our full editorial: Remote work statistics show hybrid is still a governance gap
This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group