Subscribe to the Non-Human & AI Identity Journal

Notifications
Clear all

Remote work statistics: what IAM and access teams should rethink


(@nhi-mgmt-group)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2827
Topic starter  

TL;DR: Remote work has grown from about 4% of U.S. jobs before the pandemic to more than 15% today, while 74% of employees say remote work makes them happier and 80% of people leaders describe hybrid setups as emotionally draining, according to StrongDM and cited research. The governance lesson is that location flexibility does not remove identity, access, or boundary-management problems; it just shifts them into more fragmented control planes.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by StrongDM: 11 Surprising Statistics on Remote Work for 2026

By the numbers:

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should security teams govern access for remote workers without relying on the office perimeter?

A: Security teams should govern remote access with continuous verification, device posture checks, and session-level policy enforcement.

Q: Why does hybrid work create more identity governance risk than fully remote work in some organisations?

A: Hybrid work creates more identity governance risk because it adds context switching, duplicate device patterns, and more uneven approval cycles.

Q: What breaks when remote work policies do not include non-human identities?

A: What breaks is the hidden control layer that keeps collaboration and automation running.

Practitioner guidance

  • Rebase remote access on continuous verification Tie remote-session authorisation to device posture, conditional policy, and action sensitivity instead of trusting network location or a successful initial login.
  • Audit hybrid-work lifecycle drift Check whether joiner-mover-leaver workflows update entitlements when employees change working location, devices, or collaboration patterns.
  • Extend governance to supporting NHIs Inventory the service accounts, tokens, and API credentials that keep remote collaboration and automation running, then review them on the same cadence as user access.

What's in the full article

StrongDM's full blog post covers the supporting statistics and workplace findings this post intentionally leaves at the governance level:

  • The cited remote-work survey breakdowns behind the 74% happiness and 80% hybrid exhaustion findings
  • The productivity, cost, and burnout statistics referenced across the article's 11 data points
  • The article's own framing of hybrid work, commute reduction, and employee retention tradeoffs
  • The source reference list that supports each stat for readers who need to trace the original studies

👉 Read StrongDM's remote work statistics article for the source data →

Remote work statistics: what IAM and access teams should rethink?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →



   
Quote
Share: