Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 12:44 am
TL;DR: SAP Access Control centralises access risk analysis, request workflows, role management, certification, and emergency access for SAP and non-SAP environments, according to Pathlock. The bigger lesson is that access governance fails when roles, approvals, and reviews drift away from the actual business permissions being granted and revoked.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Pathlock: What is SAP Access Control?
By the numbers:
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities , 46% confirmed, 26% suspected.
Questions worth separating out
Q: What breaks when SAP access reviews are not tied to business roles?
A: Access reviews become checkbox exercises when roles are not defined in business terms.
Q: Why do SAP environments need emergency access governance?
A: SAP environments need emergency access governance because privileged access is often required during incidents, but that access can become a standing exception if it is not logged and reviewed.
Q: How do organisations know whether access risk analysis is actually working?
A: It is working when conflicting permissions are detected before provisioning, not only in after-the-fact reports.
Practitioner guidance
- Map critical SAP roles to real business processes Rebuild role definitions around finance, sales, HR, and order-processing tasks so access reviews evaluate business function, not just technical entitlement bundles.
- Run segregation of duties checks before provisioning Use embedded risk simulation during access requests so approvers see conflicting permissions before access is granted or emergency elevation is approved.
- Separate emergency access from standard approval paths Log all firefighter activity, route sessions to independent reviewers, and verify that temporary elevation is removed once the incident is closed.
What's in the full article
Pathlock's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Module-by-module setup guidance for ARA, ARM, BRM, UAR, and EAM in SAP environments
- Integration specifics for SAP and non-SAP systems, including connectors and workflow extensions
- Implementation detail on role simulation, approval routing, and emergency access logging
- Configuration and deployment notes for hybrid SAP and cloud-connected estates
👉 Read Pathlock's full guide to SAP access control modules and governance →
SAP access control governance: are your access reviews keeping up?
Explore further
25/06/2026 9:44 am
Access governance fails when role design drifts away from business reality: SAP Access Control only works when roles mirror actual processes, not technical convenience. When roles accumulate redundant permissions or are maintained as static bundles, segregation of duties becomes a paper control rather than an operating control. The implication is that role engineering is a governance discipline, not an admin function.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 85% of organisations lack full visibility into third-party vendors connected via OAuth apps, according to the State of Non-Human Identity Security.
- Only 1.5 out of 10 organisations are highly confident in their ability to secure NHIs, compared to nearly 1 in 4 for securing human identities.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own SAP role design and access certification?
A: Role design should sit with business owners and governance teams together, while access certification should be owned by people who can judge whether the access still matches the underlying job function. Technical administrators should execute changes, but not define business need on their own.
👉 Read our full editorial: SAP access control and the governance gap in enterprise IAM
