Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 2:31 pm
TL;DR: Governance of human and non-human access across applications, data, and business processes sits at the center of a converging identity cloud, with more than 100 million identities protected, according to Saviynt. The signal is less about branding and more about the convergence of IAM, IGA, PAM, and NHI governance into one control surface.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Saviynt: Explore Saviynt's latest developments and identity cloud overview
By the numbers:
- Over 100 million identities protected, and counting.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams govern human and non-human identities together?
A: Security teams should govern both through the same lifecycle controls for ownership, entitlement scope, recertification, and offboarding.
Q: Why do service accounts create governance risk when they are not actively managed?
A: Service accounts create risk because they often persist longer than the applications they support, accumulate privilege over time, and escape normal review cycles.
Q: How do organisations know if identity security posture management is working?
A: It is working if posture findings lead to measurable entitlement reduction, fewer stale accounts, and shorter remediation cycles.
Practitioner guidance
- Map every non-human identity to an accountable owner Assign a named business or engineering owner to each service account, token, certificate, and workload identity so lifecycle decisions have a clear approver and reviewer.
- Separate standing privilege from runtime need Review where machine identities still carry persistent elevated access and move those permissions into time-bound or task-bound controls.
- Unify access reviews across human and non-human estates Run certification cycles from a single entitlement source so reviewers can see workforce accounts, service accounts, and privileged pathways in one process.
What's in the full article
Saviynt's full overview covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Product and platform navigation across its identity cloud modules for governance, PAM, and NHI use cases
- Capability descriptions for just-in-time access, identity security posture management, and AI agent governance
- Company positioning around how its platform is packaged for different identity and compliance programmes
- Breadth of application across human identities, non-human access, and business process governance
👉 Read Saviynt's overview of its identity cloud and non-human access governance →
Saviynt’s identity cloud and what it means for IAM teams?
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services →
25/06/2026 3:40 pm
Identity programmes are converging around the same control problem across people and machines. The article reflects a broader market truth: organisations do not have separate identity problems so much as separate views of the same governance problem. When human IAM, NHI governance, PAM, and IGA are split across different operating models, entitlement drift becomes harder to see and harder to certify. The practitioner conclusion is that governance has to be organised around control outcomes, not identity labels.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 44% of developers are reported to follow security best practices for secrets management, exposing a significant developer behaviour gap, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
- The average estimated time to remediate a leaked secret is 27 days, despite 75% of organisations expressing strong confidence in their secrets management capabilities.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What is the difference between just-in-time access and least privilege for machine identity?
A: Least privilege defines the minimum permissions an identity should have, while just-in-time access limits how long elevated access exists. For machine identity, both are necessary. Least privilege reduces the default blast radius, and just-in-time access narrows the exposure window when a workload genuinely needs more power.
👉 Read our full editorial: Saviynt’s identity cloud points to broader governance across human and NHI access
