Topic starter
25/06/2026 3:05 pm
TL;DR: Healthcare organisations are losing an average of 13 minutes per clinician shift to mobile device setup, with 87% reporting access challenges and 79% saying credentials are shared on devices, according to Imprivata's 2025 State of Shared Mobile Devices in Healthcare report. Shared mobile works only when identity, device readiness, and auditability are managed as one workflow.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Imprivata: “From 13 minutes to instant access: Optimizing your shared mobile program”.
By the numbers:
- Clinicians waste an average of 13 minutes per shift just getting mobile devices ready to use.
- The report says 40% of delays come from limited device availability, 39% from time-consuming shift handovers, and 35% each from manual allocation and low battery.
- 87% of organisations report access challenges on shared mobile devices, while 86% report usability problems.
Key questions
Q: What breaks when shared mobile access still depends on passwords and manual handovers?
A: The access flow becomes slow, brittle, and easy to bypass.
Q: Why do shared mobile devices increase security risk in healthcare settings?
A: They increase risk because the device can remain signed in after one clinician finishes, then carry access into the next interaction.
Q: How do hospitals know whether shared mobile access is working well?
A: They should track login completion time, frequency of access workarounds, reassignment speed, and the rate of lost or unrecoverable devices.
Practitioner guidance
- Implement identity-led device checkout Tie device assignment, user authentication, and app access to a single checkout workflow so clinicians receive a ready, personalised session without manual allocation steps.
- Replace password-first shared access Use badge-tap or other passwordless methods for shared clinical devices so reauthentication does not become the default bottleneck at shift change.
- Enforce session reset on return Automatically terminate the session, clear user state, and lock the device when it is returned so the next clinician starts from a clean baseline.
Bottom line: Shared mobile access fails when identity, device readiness, and session control are managed as separate activities instead of one governed workflow.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
25/06/2026 4:23 pm
Shared mobile access is an identity governance problem before it is a device problem. The article shows that time lost at shift start comes from failures in authentication, handover, personalization, and session control operating as separate steps. In healthcare, that separation breaks the access model because clinicians need a ready identity context at the same moment they need the device. The implication is that mobile access governance has to be designed as a unified workflow, not a sequence of disconnected approvals.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own shared mobile governance in a hospital?
A: Shared mobile governance should be owned jointly by IAM, security, and clinical operations, because the control problem spans access, device custody, and workflow readiness. If any one group owns it alone, the programme usually drifts into either poor usability or weak enforcement.
👉 Read our full editorial: Shared mobile access in healthcare is an identity problem