Topic starter
25/06/2026 12:15 am
TL;DR: Healthcare organisations are under strain from clinician shortages and burnout, and Imprivata says 62% of clinicians struggle to access shared devices quickly while nearly one in four devices are lost each year. The real issue is not mobility itself but whether identity controls can reduce friction without weakening access governance.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Imprivata: “As Clinician Burnout Surges, Shared Mobile Programs Can Bring Relief”.
By the numbers:
- 62% of clinicians struggle to access shared devices quickly, according to Imprivata research.
Key questions
Q: How should healthcare organisations secure shared mobile devices without slowing clinicians down?
A: Use individual identity, passwordless re-authentication, and strong session controls so staff can move quickly without sharing credentials or leaving devices signed in.
Q: Why do shared mobile programs often create more friction than they remove?
A: They fail when identity controls are designed around individual device ownership instead of shift-based clinical work.
A: The clearest signs are repeated manual logins, slow task completion, low user acceptance, and staff working around controls to get clinical work done.
Practitioner guidance
- Map shared mobile access to clinical roles Define which clinical functions need which applications, sessions, and device states so access is granted by role rather than by repeated manual approval.
- Automate device provisioning and re-provisioning Build provisioning flows that can issue, reset, and hand off shared devices quickly when staff shift, devices are lost, or workflows change.
- Deploy passwordless access inside governed IAM policy Use passwordless authentication and SSO to reduce login friction, but keep policy boundaries, entitlement review, and device-state checks explicit.
Bottom line: Shared mobile access in healthcare is a governance issue because login friction affects both workforce sustainability and care delivery.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
25/06/2026 9:07 am
Shared clinical mobility only works when access is treated as a governed workflow. The article shows that clinician burnout and login friction are now operational risks, not just productivity complaints. In healthcare, every extra authentication step competes with time at the bedside, so access design becomes part of care delivery. The implication is that IAM teams should evaluate shared mobile programs as workflow infrastructure, not as isolated device management projects.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should security teams govern passwordless authentication for enterprise access?
A: Security teams should govern passwordless authentication the same way they govern other privileged identity paths: assign ownership, define enrollment standards, enforce expiry, and require rapid revocation. Passwordless reduces phishing exposure, but it still depends on device integrity, recovery controls, and policy enforcement. Treat it as an identity lifecycle problem, not only an authentication upgrade.
👉 Read our full editorial: Shared mobile access can reduce clinical burnout and login friction