Topic starter
25/06/2026 12:21 am
TL;DR: A UK and Ireland study across 55 hospitals found that single sign-on and access management cut desktop login time by 60%, sped application access by more than 50%, and redirected 3.3 million clinician hours annually to patient care, according to Imprivata. The core lesson is that human IAM controls in clinical settings must be judged on both security and workflow impact, because friction itself becomes a governance risk.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Imprivata: “Making a difference to patient care: The true value of access in clinical workflows”.
By the numbers:
- Across 55 hospitals in the UK and Ireland, the study measured login and application access changes before and after SSO/AM deployment.
- Clinicians saw a 60% reduction in desktop login time after the solution deployment.
- Application access became over 50% faster after deployment.
Key questions
A: Healthcare teams should combine strong identity controls with a workflow designed around fast clinical access.
A: Repeated authentication breaks clinician focus, slows care delivery, and increases the chance that users work around controls.
Q: What are the signs that hospital access controls are too burdensome?
A: Common signs include frequent password prompts, delayed access to applications, shared logins, and staff staying signed in to avoid interruptions.
Practitioner guidance
- Map authentication friction across clinical workflows Measure where repeated logins, password prompts, and workstation switching most often interrupt care, then prioritise those paths for redesign.
- Pair SSO with session governance Require automatic locking, reauthentication, and auditable session continuity on shared clinical endpoints so faster access does not weaken accountability.
- Eliminate shared-login workarounds Find teams still relying on shared credentials or staying logged in to avoid delay, then remove the workflow pressure that makes those behaviours attractive.
Bottom line: Hospital access controls can become a security problem when they create enough friction that clinicians adopt risky workarounds.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
25/06/2026 9:16 am
Clinical authentication friction is an identity control issue, not just a user-experience problem. In hospitals, repeated logins and multiple passwords do more than slow clinicians down. They create the conditions for shared credentials, skipped logout steps, and weaker auditability, which means the control itself starts to erode under operational pressure. The governance conclusion is straightforward: if access design does not fit care delivery, policy compliance will decay in practice.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do clinicians benefit when access controls are redesigned around workflow?
A: Clinicians spend less time authenticating and more time on patient care, while security teams gain a more auditable access model. The practical benefit is not just speed, but fewer workarounds and better session discipline across shared devices.
👉 Read our full editorial: Single sign-on in hospitals: security and workflow gains in care