Topic starter
14/09/2026 10:09 am
TL;DR: Software asset and license management is shifting from inventory control to a governance layer for cost transparency, compliance, and hybrid IT visibility, according to Efecte’s summary of techconsult’s PUR 2026 benchmark. The practical implication is that SAM now has to operate as part of broader IT operations, not as a standalone audit function.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Efecte: “Rated by users, named a Champion—what the PUR 2026 really means for Matrix42”.
By the numbers:
- Matrix42 was named a Champion by over 3,390 IT professionals who use the solution every day.
Key questions
Q: How should organisations treat software asset management in a hybrid IT environment?
A: Organisations should treat SAM as an operational governance control that connects entitlement data, usage evidence, and remediation workflows across SaaS, endpoints, and on-premises systems.
Q: Why does isolated software license tracking fail in modern IT operations?
A: Isolated tracking fails because software consumption now changes faster than manual inventories can keep up.
Q: What signs show that SAM is still operating as an audit function?
A: Common signs include separate spreadsheets or point tools for entitlement tracking, slow compliance reporting, repeated manual reconciliations, and limited connection to deployment or renewal workflows.
Practitioner guidance
- Reframe SAM as a governance control Define SAM success in terms of compliance evidence, cost transparency, and remediation speed, not only inventory completeness.
- Map software entitlements into operational workflows Connect license records to procurement, deployment, renewal, and exception handling so entitlement drift can be acted on inside the normal IT process.
- Test for a single source of software truth Check whether service management, asset management, UEM, and automation share one data model or leave teams reconciling conflicting records.
Bottom line: Software asset management is being evaluated as a governance control because it now affects cost, compliance, and operational transparency across hybrid IT.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
14/09/2026 10:10 am
SAM is now a governance control, not a back-office inventory function. The article reflects a broader shift in IT operations: software entitlements now affect compliance, spend, and operating discipline at the same time. When a control begins to influence remediation and evidence production, it stops being a reporting afterthought and becomes part of governance architecture. Practitioners should assess SAM on its ability to drive action, not only on whether it counts assets accurately.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Why does platform integration matter more than standalone SAM features?
A: Standalone features can count assets, but they cannot reliably close the loop between demand, ownership, policy and retirement. Integration matters because governance fails when data sits in separate systems. The more fragmented the workflow, the more likely hidden spend and audit gaps become permanent.
👉 Read our full editorial: Software asset management is becoming a governance control