Topic starter
12/02/2026 8:43 pm
TL;DR: Privileged access management limits elevated access, reduces unmanaged privilege exposure, and supports compliance by centralising controls for human and service accounts, according to StrongDM. The issue is no longer whether PAM matters, but whether organisations can govern privileged access across cloud, hybrid, and machine-driven environments without creating new blind spots.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by StrongDM: “What is Privileged Access Management? PAM Security Explained”.
Key questions
Q: When does privileged access management fail in practice?
A: It fails when organisations equate password vaulting with governance.
Q: Why do service accounts and SSH keys create such a large lateral movement risk?
A: Because they are reusable machine identities with no natural friction once stolen.
Q: How do teams know whether PAM is actually reducing risk?
A: Look for fewer standing privileges, shorter elevation windows, complete session logging, and lower privilege creep across admin and machine identities.
Practitioner guidance
- Inventory privileged accounts by capability Build a register of accounts, keys and secrets that can change systems, provision infrastructure or access sensitive data.
- Remove standing privilege from routine work Force day-to-day administration through non-privileged access and reserve elevation for narrowly scoped tasks.
- Tie access to lifecycle events Revoke or re-certify privileged access when people change roles, projects end or vendors finish work.
Bottom line: Privileged access management breaks down when elevated accounts are left unmanaged across role changes, vendors and service automation.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
07/10/2026 9:36 pm
Privileged access remains a lifecycle problem, not a point product problem. The article shows that organisations fail when they treat PAM as a control layer only for admins instead of a governed lifecycle for humans, service accounts and vendors. Privilege becomes dangerous when it outlives the role, the job or the system change that created it. The practitioner conclusion is to govern privileged access as an end-to-end identity lifecycle.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What is the difference between IAM and PAM for least privilege?
A: IAM establishes verified identity and routine access boundaries. PAM enforces least privilege where the risk is highest, by controlling elevated credentials, privileged roles, and sensitive administrative sessions. In practice, IAM answers who the user is, while PAM answers how much access that user should receive, for how long, and under what monitoring conditions.
👉 Read our full editorial: Privileged access management gaps persist in modern IAM programs