Topic starter
22/01/2026 5:10 pm
TL;DR: Privileged account management fails most often at visibility, inconsistent policy enforcement, password hygiene, session monitoring, third-party access, incident response, and scale, with weak controls turning elevated access into a persistent breach path, according to Keeper Security. Standing privilege, weak oversight, and slow containment remain the real governance problems, not the absence of another point tool.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Keeper Security: “Top Challenges in Managing Privileged Accounts and How To Overcome Them”.
Key questions
Q: What breaks when privileged access is not continuously governed?
A: When privileged access is not continuously governed, standing privilege persists, dormant accounts remain usable, and the attack surface expands across human and machine identities.
Q: Why do standing privileges create outsized risk in PAM programmes?
A: Standing privileges create risk because they leave high-impact access available long after the original need has passed.
Q: How do security teams know whether privileged session controls are actually working?
A: They should test whether high-risk admin sessions are phishing-resistant, bound to known devices, and short-lived enough to prevent reuse after compromise.
Practitioner guidance
- Map every privileged account to an owner and approval path Create a complete inventory of admin, vendor, shared, and emergency accounts, then assign each one a business owner, technical owner, and review cadence.
- Enforce expiration on elevated access Use JIT workflows and ephemeral credentials so privileged access exists only for the task window, then revokes automatically when the task completes.
- Standardise privileged policy by role Replace inconsistent per-team rules with RBAC and least privilege so access follows the role, not the individual, and recertification can detect drift.
Bottom line: Privileged account risk is driven by governance gaps that leave access difficult to inventory, review, and revoke.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 hours ago by NHI Mgmt Group
11/10/2026 2:11 am
Privileged access governance fails first at visibility, not at enforcement. Organisations cannot govern what they cannot inventory, and fragmented views across cloud, on-prem, and third-party access turn every downstream control into guesswork. That is why privileged access management has to start with authoritative account discovery and continuous oversight, not periodic clean-up. The practitioner conclusion is simple: if elevated access is not centrally visible, it is not governable.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 36% of health IT leaders say their organisation applies a privileged access strategy consistently across the enterprise, according to Ponemon Institute research.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should organisations handle third-party privileged access without giving up control?
A: Organizations should grant external vendors temporary, controlled access with clear expiration, monitoring, and audit trails. PAM makes this practical by separating vendor access from broad internal privileges and by maintaining visibility into activity. That approach supports collaboration while limiting exposure, preserving data integrity, and making it easier to review what external users did during their session.
👉 Read our full editorial: Privileged account governance gaps that keep exposing organisations