Why PAM and IGA Tools Fail to Address Key Identity Challenges

Executive Summary

PAM (Privileged Access Management) and IGA (Identity Governance & Administration) tools are crucial for security, yet they often fall short in addressing significant identity challenges. Despite investments, attackers exploit gaps in these systems, bypassing protections and using unmonitored access routes. This article by Hydden explores the shortcomings of conventional PAM and IGA architectures, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach to identity security that captures comprehensive data for effective decision-making.

 Read the full article from Hydden here for comprehensive insights.

Key Insights

The Limitations of PAM and IGA

• PAM ensures secure access but can miss critical identity vulnerabilities lurking in overlooked areas.
• IGA provides governance but often lacks comprehensive visibility across the identity landscape.

Fragmented Data Challenges

• Identity security tools collect specialized data, leading to silos that hinder complete situational awareness.
• Lack of data integration limits effective threat remediation and context understanding.

Identifying Unseen Threats

• Attackers utilize hidden access paths and system gaps not visible through traditional security measures.
• Recognizing these vulnerabilities requires a more holistic view of the identity and access environment.

The Need for a Unified Approach

• Organizations must move towards integrated identity solutions that consolidate data from PAM and IGA.
• A unified approach enhances visibility and aids in proactive threat detection and response.

 Access the full expert analysis and actionable security insights from Hydden here.