Topic starter
22/01/2026 2:56 pm
TL;DR: Zero standing privilege, policy-based access control, and real-time signal sharing are converging as IAM moves away from static roles and permanent entitlements, according to SGNL’s analysis of Martin Kuppinger’s 2040 vision. The practical issue is that standing access now acts as a persistent risk multiplier, not a convenience feature.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by SGNL: “2040 IAM vision, todayâs reality: Zero Standing Privilege takes center stage”.
Key questions
Q: What breaks when privilege creep is left unchecked in IAM programmes?
A: When privilege creep is left unchecked, access no longer matches business need, so users and service accounts retain capabilities that should have expired.
Q: Why does policy-based access control depend so heavily on real-time signals?
A: Policy-based access control only works when the signals behind the decision are current enough to reflect actual risk and context.
Q: How do organisations know when role-based access is no longer enough?
A: Role-based access stops being enough when the same role repeatedly grants more access than a task requires, or when the role cannot adapt to changing context without manual exceptions.
Practitioner guidance
- Replace standing access with task-scoped issuance Map the accounts, groups, and entitlements that remain active by default and convert the highest-risk ones to short-lived access patterns first.
- Tune policy decisions to live signals Define which context signals are authoritative for access and remove inputs that are stale, duplicated, or too noisy to support a reliable decision.
- Reduce role dependence in high-change environments Use roles for coarse grouping only, then push the final allow or deny decision to policy that can account for current risk and task context.
Bottom line: Zero standing privilege is shifting IAM from persistent entitlement management toward access that exists only when the current context justifies it.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 6 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
06/10/2026 9:04 pm
Zero standing privilege is becoming the default control model because persistent privilege no longer matches how access is actually used. The article’s core point is not that organisations want less access, but that access needs to exist only for the time window in which it is justified. That makes standing entitlements a governance debt rather than a convenience layer. Practitioners should treat permanence as the exception and decision-time issuance as the operating assumption.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Should IAM teams prioritise zero standing privilege over broader access reviews?
A: Yes, when the main risk is persistent privilege rather than unknown entitlement ownership. Access reviews can tell you what exists, but they do not prevent access from persisting longer than necessary. Zero standing privilege reduces the exposure window itself, which is often the more effective control when misuse can happen faster than a review cycle.
👉 Read our full editorial: Zero standing privilege is becoming the IAM default for 2040