Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 12:33 am
TL;DR: Cloud identity entitlement management tools are being evaluated for visibility, entitlement sprawl reduction, and compliance support across multi-cloud estates, according to Delinea’s 2026 shortlist. The governance issue is larger than tooling choice: CIEM now sits at the boundary between cloud IAM, PAM, and lifecycle control.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Delinea: Top CIEM solutions to know in 2026
By the numbers:
- 70% of organisations grant AI systems more access than they would give a human employee performing the exact same job.
- Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security.
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should teams use CIEM to reduce cloud entitlement sprawl?
A: Start by grouping identities by type, then map effective permissions, not just assigned roles.
Q: Why do over-privileged cloud identities create so much risk?
A: Over-privileged identities widen the blast radius when credentials are compromised or when access is misused internally.
Q: What do security teams get wrong about cloud access reviews?
A: They often treat access reviews as a reporting exercise instead of a lifecycle control.
Practitioner guidance
- Classify entitlements by actor type Separate human admins, service accounts, workload identities, and federated roles before using CIEM data to make removal decisions.
- Trace effective access, not assigned access Review role inheritance, policy chaining, and cross-account trust relationships to find what identities can actually reach in production.
- Tie CIEM findings to lifecycle controls Route excessive or unused permissions into offboarding, recertification, and exception-removal workflows so the same entitlement does not survive multiple review cycles.
What's in the full article
Delinea's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Vendor-by-vendor feature comparisons across cloud, SaaS, and hybrid identity use cases.
- Product-specific descriptions of entitlement graphing, policy automation, and PAM integration.
- Implementation-oriented detail on how each CIEM tool surfaces unused or excessive permissions.
- Platform-specific guidance on which cloud environments each tool maps most effectively.
👉 Read Delinea's roundup of top CIEM solutions for 2026 →
CIEM in 2026: are cloud entitlement controls keeping up?
Explore further
25/06/2026 9:29 am
CIEM is becoming the governance layer that exposes whether cloud access is actually explainable. The core issue is no longer whether teams can list permissions. It is whether they can explain why a human, service account, or workload still holds them. That is a governance test, not just a tooling test, and it matters most when cloud estates span multiple providers and policy models. Practitioners should treat unexplained entitlement as a control failure, not a dashboard anomaly.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 70% of organisations grant AI systems more access than they would give a human employee performing the exact same job, according to the 2026 Infrastructure Identity Survey.
- 67% of organisations still rely heavily on static credentials despite the risks they pose to agentic AI deployments, according to the 2026 Infrastructure Identity Survey.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Which frameworks are relevant to CIEM governance?
A: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Zero Trust Architecture both apply because CIEM is about continuously understanding and limiting access. For NHI-heavy estates, OWASP Non-Human Identity guidance is also relevant because service accounts and workload identities create the same entitlement risks as cloud admins.
👉 Read our full editorial: Cloud identity entitlement management in 2026 needs tighter governance
