Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› IT and Security RACI Template: Who Owns Patching,…
Template Security Leadership & Governance

IT and Security RACI Template: Who Owns Patching, Accounts, Keys and Logs

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 11 November 2026 9 min read
On this page

Most day-to-day security work is done by IT teams, not the security team, and the gaps sit between them: the server team assumes security tracks the patch deadline, security assumes the cloud team rotates the key, and nobody owns the log source that went quiet. This template splits routine security operations by IT function, so that patching, human and machine accounts, keys, secrets and certificates, and logging each have one accountable owner per platform. It complements the Security RACI Matrix Template, which covers incident response and programme decisions, and the Shared Responsibility Matrix Template, which splits duties between you and your providers. NIST CSF 2.0 expects roles, responsibilities and authorities to be established, communicated, understood and enforced (GV.RR-02). It is for CIOs, CISOs, IT operations leads and GRC teams.

How to use this template

  • Replace placeholders: text in square brackets, such as [Organisation] and [Head of Infrastructure], is for your own titles. Use roles in the matrix and keep names in a separate contact list.
  • Read the codes: R = Responsible (does the work), A = Accountable (one role, owns the outcome and signs off), C = Consulted before the action, I = Informed after it.
  • Merge or split columns: the nine columns in section 2 suit a mid-sized organisation. A small organisation may have one IT team covering EUC, INF and NET; a large one may split CLD by cloud provider. Keep one A per row after merging.
  • The assignments are defaults: every R and A below is an NHI Mgmt Group starting point, not a standard. Change them to match who actually holds the access to act.
  • Accountability follows the platform, oversight follows security: the team that runs a platform is usually accountable for doing the security task on it; the security function sets the standard, checks it and escalates. If that pattern does not hold for you, write down why.

1. Purpose and scope

1.1 This matrix assigns responsibility for routine security operations across IT functions at [Organisation]. It applies to all systems [Organisation] owns or operates and to services run for it under contract.

1.2 It covers human accounts and non-human identities: service accounts, API keys, workload identities, certificates, secrets and AI agents that hold credentials.

1.3 Incident response roles are in the [Security RACI Matrix]. Provider and customer duties for cloud and managed services are in the [Shared Responsibility Matrix]. Where they conflict, the incident matrix applies during a declared incident.

1.4 Owner: [CIO]. Co-owner: [CISO]. Approver: [IT and Security Governance Board]. Review at least every [12] months and after any reorganisation, outsourcing change or audit finding about ownership.

2. Roles

CodeRoleTypical scope
EUC[End-User Computing Lead]Laptops, desktops, mobile devices, endpoint management
INF[Head of Infrastructure]Servers, hypervisors, directory servers, storage, backup
NET[Network Lead]Firewalls, routers, switches, VPN, wireless, DNS
CLD[Cloud Platform Lead]Cloud accounts, subscriptions and projects, Kubernetes, landing zones
APP[Application Owner]Business applications and SaaS, including their integrations
IAM[Identity and Access Lead]Identity provider, directories, access reviews, PAM, NHI inventory
SOC[Security Operations Lead]SIEM, detection content, alert triage, vulnerability scanning
SEC[CISO or Security Governance Lead]Standards, risk acceptance advice, assurance, metrics
BO[Business or System Owner]Owns the business risk of a system and accepts residual risk

3. Patching and vulnerability remediation

ActivityEUCINFNETCLDAPPIAMSOCSECBO
Set patch SLAs by severity and exposureCCCCCCA/RI
Scan and report vulnerabilitiesIIIIIA/RI
Patch endpoints and mobile devicesA/RII
Patch servers, hypervisors and directory serversA/RCCIII
Update network and edge device firmwareA/RII
Update container images and cloud-managed servicesA/RCII
Update application code, libraries and SaaS settingsCA/RII
Apply an emergency out-of-band patchRRRRRCAI
Accept risk of a missed SLA or unsupported systemCCCCCRA
Verify remediation and report SLA performanceIIIIIRAI

3.1 Patching the patching tools: credentials held by endpoint management, configuration management and patch deployment systems are privileged non-human identities. They are owned by the platform team that runs the tool (R/A) and inventoried by IAM (C). See the Patch Management Guide and the Emergency Out-of-Band Patching Playbook.

3.2 An emergency patch is directed by [CISO] (A) because it overrides normal change windows; each platform team remains Responsible for its own systems.

4. Human accounts and access

ActivityEUCINFNETCLDAPPIAMSOCSECBO
Provision joiner accounts from HR eventsIRA/RC
Change access for moversRA/RC
Disable leavers in the identity provider and local systemsRRRRRAII
Approve access to a systemCRA
Run periodic access reviewsCCCCRIA
Manage privileged admin accounts on the platformRRRRRAIC
Manage emergency (break glass) accountsRRRRCA

4.1 Platform teams are Responsible for removing local, non-federated accounts on their own systems; IAM is Accountable that leavers are fully removed. See the Joiner-Mover-Leaver Guide.

5. Non-human identities, keys, secrets and certificates

ActivityEUCINFNETCLDAPPIAMSOCSECBO
Name a human owner for every service account, API key and workload identityRRRRAIC
Maintain the NHI inventoryCCCCA/RCI
Run the secrets manager and its access policyCA/RCCC
Rotate a secret or key on scheduleRRRRCIA
Revoke a leaked credentialRRRRCAII
Issue and renew TLS and code signing certificatesRRRRAI
Manage cryptographic key policy and HSM or KMS administrationRRA
Review third-party app and OAuth grantsCRRCIA
Decommission NHIs when a system or integration is retiredRRRRCIA

5.1 Rotation is Accountable to the business or system owner because a failed rotation is an outage of their service; IAM sets the standard and checks it. Revocation of a leaked credential is Accountable to security operations, because speed matters more than service continuity at that point.

5.2 See the NHI Ownership Guide, the Secrets Management Guide and the Machine Identity, PKI and Certificate Lifecycle Guide.

6. Logging and monitoring

ActivityEUCINFNETCLDAPPIAMSOCSECBO
Define required log sources and retentionCCCCCCRAC
Turn on and forward logs from the platformRRRRRRA
Detect and fix a silent log sourceRRRRRRAI
Write and tune detection rulesCCCCCA/RI
Protect log integrity and SIEM admin accessCA/RC
Pay for log licensing and storage tiersCRAC

6.1 Some SaaS audit logs depend on licence tier. The application owner is Consulted on licensing and Responsible for turning logging on. See the SaaS Audit Log Retention and Licensing Guide and the SIEM Log Source Onboarding Checklist.

7. Backups and recovery credentials

ActivityEUCINFNETCLDAPPIAMSOCSECBO
Back up systems and test restoresA/RRCIC
Isolate backup admin accounts and service credentialsRRCCA
Set recovery objectivesCCCCA/R

8. Exceptions, sign-off and review

8.1 A team that cannot meet a Responsible duty must raise an exception through [exception process], naming the compensating control and an end date. The BO accepts the residual risk; SEC records it.

8.2 Each role holder signs the matrix on approval. Unsigned rows are treated as unowned and reported to the [IT and Security Governance Board].

8.3 Changes to an A require approval by both [CIO] and [CISO].

Implementation guidance

Rollout steps

  1. Start from real access. For each row, check who holds the permissions to act. If the accountable role cannot perform or direct the task, the matrix is wrong.
  2. Fill gaps first. Rows with no R, and platforms with no owner (often SaaS, shadow cloud accounts and old service accounts), are the findings worth escalating.
  3. Walk it through. Agree each A one to one with the role holder, then in a joint IT and security session.
  4. Test with two scenarios. A critical edge device vulnerability with a 48-hour deadline, and a leaked cloud API key found in a public repository. Record where people acted differently from the matrix.
  5. Publish and embed. Link the matrix from the patch, access, key management and logging policies, and from job descriptions (CSF GV.RR-04).
  6. Roll back. Keep the previous approved version; if a change causes confusion, revert until the next review.

Framework mapping

SectionNIST CSF 2.0NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
Roles and sign-offGV.RR-02, GV.RR-04PM-2, AC-5
3. PatchingID.RA-01, PR.PS-02SI-2, SA-22
4. Human accountsPR.AA-01, PR.AA-05AC-2, PS-4, PS-5
5. NHIs, keys and certificatesPR.AA-01IA-5, SC-12, SC-17
6. LoggingPR.PS-04, DE.CM-09AU-6, AU-9, AU-11
7. BackupsPR.DS-11CP-9

Metrics

  • Rows with exactly one A: target 100%.
  • Service accounts, keys and certificates with a named owner: target 100% for production.
  • Patch SLA met, by platform team: reported monthly per column, not as one IT figure.
  • Required log sources reporting in the last 24 hours: target above 98%, with silent sources assigned to an owner.
  • Open exceptions past end date: target zero.

Common failure patterns

  • Security as the default owner: every unclear row goes to SEC, which has no admin access to fix it.
  • One IT column: "IT" is Accountable for all patching, so no platform lead is measured.
  • Owners of people, not machines: every leaver row is assigned, but nobody owns the service account the leaver created.
  • SaaS left out: application owners are missing from the matrix, so SaaS logging and OAuth grants have no R.

For how teams fit together more broadly, see the Security Operating Model and Organisation Design Guide and the Identity Team Operating Model and Workforce Planning Guide.

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Security RACI Matrix Template · Shared Responsibility Models Guide · NHI Ownership Guide · Patch Management Policy Template

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 11 November 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org