Topic starter
02/08/2026 12:27 pm
TL;DR: Application security education is increasingly being made more accessible to developers and security practitioners who still struggle with secure coding behaviour, according to Semgrep. The practical shift is less about content volume and more about a free online learning platform covering application security, secure coding, API security, static analysis, and functional programming, with certificates, quizzes, videos, and hands-on exercises.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Semgrep: “Introducing Semgrep Academy: the door to cyber security for everyone”.
Key questions
A: The best approach is to treat security training as part of the development system, not a one off awareness exercise.
Q: What should teams do first when secure coding knowledge is inconsistent?
A: Start with the highest-friction points in the development lifecycle, usually onboarding, code review and API design.
Q: What are the signs that AppSec training is actually working?
A: Look for fewer repeat findings, better code review quality, and more consistent handling of common vulnerability classes across teams.
Practitioner guidance
- Embed secure coding training in onboarding Make application security, secure coding and API security part of onboarding for developers and reviewers, then refresh it on a recurring basis as teams move between products and platforms.
- Use hands-on exercises to validate understanding Prefer training that includes quizzes, labs and practical examples so teams can demonstrate they understand secure design decisions rather than only recognising terminology.
- Map training to recurring defect patterns Tie course selection to the vulnerabilities your teams repeatedly ship, such as authorization mistakes, unsafe assumptions in APIs and weak static analysis interpretation.
Bottom line: AppSec training is a governance lever because uneven access to secure coding knowledge creates uneven security outcomes across engineering teams.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
02/08/2026 1:26 pm
Free access is a control issue, not just an education perk. When AppSec training sits behind paywalls, organisations implicitly accept uneven security capability across engineering roles and career stages. That creates an execution gap in secure coding, review quality and API security judgement. The practical consequence is that capability becomes concentrated in a few experts instead of embedded in the delivery system.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Should organisations rely on tools or training to improve application security?
A: They need both, but training addresses the human decision-making layer that tools cannot fix on their own. Static analysis can surface defects, yet secure coding habits determine whether those defects keep recurring. Training is the control that improves how people design and interpret the tools.
👉 Read our full editorial: Semgrep Academy lowers the barrier to AppSec training