Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
24/06/2026 10:04 pm
TL;DR: Passkeys are FIDO passwordless credentials that replace shared passwords with device-bound private keys, improving phishing resistance and user convenience across consumer and enterprise authentication, according to 1Kosmos. Passwordless adoption still changes IAM operating assumptions, especially around enrollment, recovery, and lifecycle governance.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by 1Kosmos: passkeys and passwordless authentication
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams implement passkeys without weakening recovery controls?
A: Security teams should implement passkeys with the same discipline they apply to other high-assurance authenticators.
Q: Why do passkeys improve security but still require IAM governance?
A: Passkeys improve security by reducing phishing and secret theft, but IAM governance is still required because identity risk moves to enrollment, device trust, and recovery.
Q: What breaks when passkeys are added without changing fallback authentication?
A: What breaks is the assurance model.
Practitioner guidance
- Define passkey enrollment policy Require a consistent enrollment standard that ties passkey registration to verified identity proofing, approved device state, and controlled authenticator binding.
- Harden recovery and reset paths Review help desk and self-service recovery flows so account reset cannot become a weaker bypass than the passkey itself, especially for high-value users.
- Map passkeys into IAM lifecycle controls Treat passkey issuance, replacement, and revocation as lifecycle events that belong in access review, offboarding, and privilege governance processes.
What's in the full article
1Kosmos's full post covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Developer integration detail for adding passkey authentication to applications.
- Examples of how passkeys fit consumer, banking, and enterprise login flows.
- The vendor's own explanation of multi-service integration across internal applications.
- Implementation context for the authentication rules and security measures described in the article.
👉 Read 1Kosmos's explanation of passkeys and passwordless authentication →
Passkeys and passwordless access: are your controls ready?
Explore further
25/06/2026 6:51 am
Passkeys improve authentication security, but they do not remove identity governance risk. The private key model reduces phishing and secret replay, yet the operational burden shifts to enrollment, device assurance, and recovery. That means the security question becomes whether the organisation can govern the lifecycle of authenticators as carefully as it once governed passwords. Practitioners should treat passkeys as a control improvement, not a governance endpoint.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 44% of developers are reported to follow security best practices for secrets management, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
- The average estimated time to remediate a leaked secret is 27 days, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do organisations know whether passkey adoption is actually working?
A: Organisations should measure whether passkeys are reducing password dependence, lowering phishing exposure, and shrinking the share of accounts that rely on weak recovery methods. Adoption is working only if the new authenticator improves real security outcomes and does not leave old bypass paths in place.
👉 Read our full editorial: Passkeys and passwordless authentication: what IAM teams need
