Access reviews and the governance gap teams keep missing

TL;DR: Access reviews fail less because teams skip them than because discovery, context, and remediation are disconnected, according to Zluri, with 53% of security teams lacking continuous cloud and SaaS visibility according to Help Net Security. Access certification only reduces risk when review scope, reviewer context, and revocation are tied together end to end.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Top Access Review Challenges IT Teams Face

By the numbers:

• 53% of security teams lack continuous and up-to-date visibility into their cloud and SaaS environments.

Questions worth separating out

Q: What breaks when access reviews only cover apps tied to SSO?

A: The review scope becomes incomplete because direct-login SaaS, department-owned tools, and shadow applications remain outside certification.

Q: When should organisations move from fixed access review cycles to event-based reviews?

A: They should do it when role churn, contractor turnover, or privilege changes happen more often than a quarterly or annual cycle can reflect.

Q: What do security teams get wrong about access review context?

A: They often treat approval as a binary task instead of a risk judgment.

Practitioner guidance

• Expand discovery beyond SSO-only coverage Combine browser data, desktop signals, finance records, and identity integrations so apps reached outside central provisioning still enter the review population.
• Enrich review decisions with live usage evidence Surface last login, activity trends, privilege level, and account status inside the certification workflow so reviewers can distinguish stale access from active business use.
• Tie approval to enforced revocation Make removal an automated downstream action whenever possible, and verify that the entitlement disappears in the target application rather than only in the governance record.

What's in the full article

Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Multi-source SaaS discovery workflow using browser, desktop, finance, and identity data
• Reviewer context examples for last login, inactivity, role changes, and privilege level
• Closed-loop revocation patterns for deprovisioning, license changes, and privilege reduction
• Multi-level certification workflow design with reminders, escalations, and audit logging

👉 Read Zluri's article on the top access review challenges IT teams face →

Access reviews and the governance gap teams keep missing?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →