Topic starter
10/07/2026 9:24 pm
TL;DR: Privileged accounts remain a high-value breach target, with Soffid citing Verizon data that roughly 40% of breaches are linked to them, while third-party access and privilege creep continue to create governance gaps across cloud, hybrid, and legacy environments. The real shift is from protecting accounts to governing privileged identity lifecycles, access scope, and review discipline.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Soffid: “Best Practices in PAM: From Privileged Account Management to Privileged Identity Governance”.
By the numbers:
- Approximately 40% of data breaches are linked to privileged accounts, according to Verizon data cited by Soffid.
- 61% of companies have experienced issues related to third-party access, according to The Ponemon Institute research cited by Soffid.
Key questions
Q: What breaks when privileged access is not continuously governed?
A: When privileged access is not continuously governed, standing privilege persists, dormant accounts remain usable, and the attack surface expands across human and machine identities.
Q: How should security teams govern privileged access in cloud and hybrid environments?
A: Teams should govern privileged access around runtime authorization, not just connectivity or login.
Q: What are the signs that access governance is failing in practice?
A: The clearest signs are slow remediation, repeated rubber stamp access reviews, and missed permissions outside traditional HR linked systems.
Practitioner guidance
- Define a privileged identity inventory Map every privileged identity, including human admins, service accounts, and external vendors, to owner, purpose, and expiry so the estate can be governed consistently.
- Enforce just-in-time privilege issuance Replace standing elevated access with task-scoped elevation that expires automatically after the approved job is complete.
- Automate re-certification for privileged access Run recurring reviews on privileged entitlements so access can be re-approved, reduced, or removed before it accumulates unmanaged scope.
Bottom line: The article’s core argument is that privileged access can no longer be managed as a static account problem, because the real risk sits in entitlement lifecycle and scope.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
10/07/2026 9:46 pm
Privileged identity governance is the right abstraction for modern PAM. The article is describing a shift from protecting a privileged account to governing the identity lifecycle behind that access. That shift matters because cloud, hybrid, and third-party access make static account controls incomplete. The practitioner conclusion is that PAM only works when it is embedded in broader identity governance.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 36% of health IT leaders say their organisation applies a privileged access strategy consistently across the enterprise, according to Ponemon Institute research.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Should organisations govern PAM, IGA, and monitoring separately or as one control model?
A: They work best as one model. PAM governs how privilege is issued and used, IGA governs whether it still makes sense, and monitoring shows whether the access is being exercised as expected. Separating them too rigidly creates gaps between approval, enforcement, and evidence, which is where privilege abuse persists.
👉 Read our full editorial: Privileged identity governance is overtaking traditional PAM models