Topic starter
12/06/2026 9:03 pm
TL;DR: Vendor management breaks down when organisations treat supplier relationships as a process problem instead of a lifecycle and access problem, according to Zluri. The real governance gap is not communication, but controlling onboarding, access revocation, and offboarding consistently across external identities and their privileges.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Zluri: “Top 8 Vendor Management Skills & How to Develop Them”.
Key questions
Q: How should security teams govern vendor access across the full lifecycle?
A: Security teams should govern vendor access from onboarding through offboarding, with explicit ownership, expiry, review, and revocation steps.
Q: Why do vendor relationships still leave access risk after the contract ends?
A: Because the contract ending does not automatically remove credentials, profiles, or application entitlements.
Q: What are the signs that vendor offboarding is failing?
A: The main signs are stale entitlements, unclear ownership, incomplete access inventories, and vendor profiles that remain active after the engagement has ended.
Practitioner guidance
- Map vendor identities to lifecycle owners Assign a named owner for every supplier identity so onboarding, entitlement changes, and removal do not drift between procurement and IT.
- Inventory vendor access before offboarding Keep a current record of every application, system, and data path a vendor can reach so revocation can be complete rather than partial.
- Separate relationship work from access governance Use communication and negotiation skills to manage the supplier relationship, but enforce access decisions through distinct IAM and review controls.
Bottom line: Vendor management becomes an identity security issue as soon as external access is granted, because the relationship itself becomes part of the control surface.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 6 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
12/06/2026 10:52 pm
Vendor management is an identity lifecycle problem once external access is involved: the article describes onboarding, access granting, inventory, deprovisioning, and offboarding as parts of the same operational flow. That is a lifecycle model, even if the article presents it through procurement language. For IAM and IGA teams, the important point is that supplier relationships become a security boundary the moment access is issued. The practitioner takeaway is to treat vendor management as governed identity lifecycle work, not as a purely relational task.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What should organisations do when a supplier needs ongoing access for a project?
A: Limit the access to the smallest practical scope, assign one accountable owner, and review the entitlement against the project timeline. Ongoing supplier access should be time-bounded and revalidated, not allowed to persist just because the relationship is still active.
👉 Read our full editorial: Vendor management skills expose the real vendor lifecycle gap
This post was modified 6 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group