Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
10/06/2026 9:13 pm
TL;DR: SaaS management tools still leave gaps in discovery, usage visibility, and access control, especially where shadow IT and unmanaged subscriptions create security and cost risk, according to Zluri. The real issue is not tool selection alone, but whether governance can keep pace with hidden SaaS identities and their access paths.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: SaaS Management Top 11 Zylo Alternatives & Competitors in 2026
By the numbers:
- Zluri says it uses 9 discovery methods to identify SaaS applications and claims nearly 100% accuracy in identifying every app in an organisation.
- According to Zluri, 22 comprehensive reports help teams track usage, spending, and security across the SaaS stack.
- Zluri says it supports 300+ direct API integrations and growing.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams govern shadow IT in SaaS environments?
A: Security teams should treat shadow IT as an identity and access problem, not only an asset discovery problem.
Q: Why do SaaS management tools matter for NHI governance?
A: SaaS platforms often contain machine-driven access through API links, delegated integrations, and service connections that behave like non-human identities.
Q: What breaks when SaaS access reviews do not include usage evidence?
A: Without usage evidence, access reviews become certifications of paperwork instead of certifications of real access.
Practitioner guidance
- Map SaaS discovery to identity inventory Require coverage of managed apps, unmanaged apps, OAuth connections, and dormant accounts so the platform reflects actual identity surface area, not just purchased software.
- Tie renewal reviews to access recertification Use contract renewal windows to confirm whether the app still has business value, whether entitlements are still used, and whether related accounts or integrations should be removed.
- Separate active use from installed use Verify that usage telemetry comes from multiple sources, including IdP signals, direct integrations, and application activity, so dormant access is not mistaken for legitimate usage.
What's in the full article
Zluri's full blog post covers the operational comparison this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Side-by-side feature breakdowns for the 11 Zylo alternatives, including discovery, spend, and security functions.
- Vendor-specific capability notes on integrations, reporting depth, and license management workflows.
- Pros and cons by platform for teams deciding which tool fits their SaaS governance model.
- Customer rating and positioning details that help readers compare market options more directly.
👉 Read Zluri's comparison of Zylo alternatives for SaaS management →
Zylo alternatives and the SaaS identity governance gap?
Explore further
10/06/2026 10:04 pm
SaaS management has become a governance problem, not just a spend problem. The article makes clear that discovery, access control, and renewal oversight are now linked, because shadow IT and unmanaged subscriptions create both waste and exposure. That means SaaS tooling is increasingly part of the identity control plane, not a separate procurement layer. Practitioners should judge these platforms by how well they reduce hidden access and support lifecycle decisions.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security, according to the 2026 Infrastructure Identity Survey.
- 69% of security leaders agree identity management must fundamentally shift to address agentic AI systems, which reinforces the need for lifecycle-driven control.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How can organisations align SaaS management with identity lifecycle controls?
A: Organisations should connect application discovery, contract renewal, entitlement review, and offboarding into one workflow. When those steps are separated, dormant accounts and unused subscriptions survive long after business need has ended. The right model treats SaaS applications, connected users, and machine integrations as governed identities with owners and end dates.
👉 Read our full editorial: Zylo alternatives expose the SaaS identity governance gap
